Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 06:21 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: >> Have you checked the robustify branch? > > I assume the usage of the result of gelf_fsize for sh_entsize instead of > shdr->sh_entsize directly helps guard against some of the same issues. > But it doesn't seem to be used consistently on the branch, so Petr's > patch still makes sense to me. Maybe combined with the robustify > branch
I reworked the patch on top of the robustify branch, which already had the elflint fixes that I posted. This time around, I was more thorough in picking up various places in readelf.c where sh_entsize use might lead to SIGFPE. It should all use gelf_fsize now. The branch pmachata/sh_entsize was force-updated and has now the new content. > approach. There were a couple more interesting fixes on that branch. > What is preventing them to be merged with master? Need a more close > review? Are these used by default on fedora? I'm wondering about this, too. PM _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
