On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 11:02 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:33:06 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > This is the disagreement, so goint to write down here a question to IBM ABI > > authority, we can agree upon the question and send it. > > Are you fine with the mail below?
I don't think dwfl_module_addrsym () really has anything to do with the ppc64 ABI since all it does is resolve an address to a symbol in a table we happen to have at hand (how is libdwfl specific, and it happens to be the function descriptor in the case of ppc64 in some cases, with the st_value adjusted). That symbol has a particular name that we just return. You might want to ask about how backtraces on ppc64 should print (function) names, but IMHO that is separate from the string that dwfl_module_addrsym () happens to return. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ elfutils-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel
