On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 16:25 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:47:06 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > I do want as much information as we can give. But IMHO the default > > should be as basic as possible. Lets do introduce a -v flag (or some > > others for symbol name demangling, module names, source/line, function > > arguments, etc.). But not right now. Lets first get the basic > > functionality in. I am very eager to finally see this committed! > > Modifying the default output in released package is not good. > So introduced the "-v" flag now.
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I don't mind the - 1 in the default output as it was. I meant that "other extras" should go under some future --verbose flag. That said, I also don't mind how you did it now. At least now we have a --verbose flag that we can add more stuff under. The change looks good. Thanks, Mark
