On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:19:32 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I think removing the const is harmless like you said. A const int is > passed by value, so is only a hint to the caller. But I am surprised you > need this. We does the parameter need to be modified? Can't you just > pass firstreg + 1 or first assign to a local var before passing the > (const) int around?
I could cope with such prototype in the code various ways but I primarily found it a typo to leave cv-qualifier in function prototype in .h file. TBH I do not see what it can hint to the caller. Jan
