Josh Stone <[email protected]> writes: > This removes the IS_LIBDW distinction so LEB128 operations are now > always inlined, and the implementations are simplified, more direct.
This looks fine. Thanks, PM
Josh Stone <[email protected]> writes: > This removes the IS_LIBDW distinction so LEB128 operations are now > always inlined, and the implementations are simplified, more direct.
This looks fine. Thanks, PM