On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 12:02 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 02/05/2014 11:58 AM, Josh Stone wrote: > > Also, an assertion on the range of line/column is now a handled error, > > setting DWARF_E_INVALID_DWARF for values greater than INT_MAX. > > Note, this is not so much INVALID as UNSUPPORTED, really, as the current > API can only deal with int values.
2^31-1 should be enough for anybody :) There is probably really something wrong when the DWARF indicates you have more than so many source lines in a file. I think INVALID is correct in this case. > I still think an assert was the wrong way to handle this Agreed. Cheers, Mark
