On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 20:18 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:30:02PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > + /* Mask to use to get the return address from an unwind in case the > > + architecture adds some extra non-address bits to it. When not > > + initialized (0) then ebl_unwind_ret_mask will return ~0, otherwise > > + it should be the actual mask to use. */ > > + GElf_Addr unwind_ret_mask; > > Shouldn't that be an Elf64_Addr?
No. None of the unwinder uses Elf32 or Elf64 specific types. GElf_Addr is used here so the unwinder code doesn't need to care about 32-vs-64 issues. Cheers, Mark
