On 06/18/2014 11:38 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > And a future version of DWARF might > use the number for a completely different purpose.
The issue you linked says this:
Remove DW_TAG_mutable_type from Appendix A (Figure 17)
(Make sure not to reassign the number 0x3e to another tag.
Perhaps we should leave the table entry in there with
an "unused" marker in place of DW_TAG_mutable_type.
So it seems they intend to leave that number out forever.
