ping, so that the patchset can move forward

On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:00:49 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:15:42 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > So I propose a cleanup like the attached first.
> 
> While I find that as an improvement in general IMO on top of your patch the
> changes could be done a bit differently.
> 
> Patricularly I at least miss there that 'e_ident'.

Reply via email to