On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 23:41 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I do like the idea. But there is one extra issue if we want this to be > an installed header like known-dwarf.h now is (and I think we do). > It is generated against libelf/elf.h which is our local copy of elf.h > from glibc. We do that to make sure we have the latest version with > all relevant constants. But that means it might be different from the > version of elf.h on the installed system. So to make it useful we > also need to install our elf.h as elfutils/elf.h. I think that is fine > but it is also a little weird since it really is glibc's elf.h.
And I just realized libelf.h includes elf.h. So mixing libelf/known-elf.h with libelf.h would be slightly tricky.
