On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 14:41 +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote: > diff --git a/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.core.bz2 > b/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.core.bz2 > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ef628af > Binary files /dev/null and b/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.core.bz2 differ > diff --git a/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.exec.bz2 > b/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.exec.bz2 > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..69ba887 > Binary files /dev/null and b/tests/backtrace.aarch64.fp.exec.bz2 differ
I got these separately. I assume they are as in the email you sent on Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:48:06 +0200 (which didn't hit the list because it had the binaries attached...) I'll but them on my mjw/fp-unwind branch (which I am rewriting currently, not pushed yet). > diff --git a/tests/run-backtrace-fp-core-aarch64.sh > b/tests/run-backtrace-fp-core-aarch64.sh > +# The binary is generated by compiling backtrace-child without debug > +# information, but with -fno-omit-frame-pointer. > +# > +# gcc -static -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -D_GNU_SOURCE \ > +# -pthread -o backtrace.aarch64.fp.exec backtrace-child.c \ > +# > +# Then strip the .eh_frame and .eh_frame_hdr sections from the binary: > +# > +# strip -R .eh_frame backtrace.aarch64.fp.exec > +# strip -R .eh_frame_hdr backtrace.aarch64.fp.exec > +# > +# The core is generated by calling the binary with --gencore This description doesn't seem to match anymore. Should this be: # The binary is generated by compiling with eh_frame CFI, but with frame # pointers. # # gcc -static -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables \ # -D_GNU_SOURCE -pthread -o tests/backtrace.x86_64.fp.exec -I. -Ilib \ # tests/backtrace-child.c # # The core is generated by calling the binary with --gencore Thanks, Mark
