https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25832
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> --- (In reply to Jory A. Pratt from comment #2) > Created attachment 12534 [details] > properly fix aarch64 support for both glibc/musl > > Patch is self explanatory Could you for those of us who don't know why there is a difference between glibc and musl here and don't know how __uint128_t and/or long double translate into to a Dwarf_Word (which is a 64bit value)? I am not sure I understand how the original code is correct. Shouldn't these values be represented by 2 dwarf registers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
