Hi Timm, On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 14:44 +0100, Timm Bäder wrote: > any update on this? I see that SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG is still not in upstream > glibc. Are you working on that, Navin? > > As for the checks, I'm not sure we can do anything here since elfutils > can't know whether a symbol is rightfully marked as address-significant.
I tried to lookup some more information about SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG, but couldn't really find much. There is this comment about it from the binutils maintainers: https://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23817#c1 I would suggest following that and wait till the design is fixed before trying to handle SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG. Cheers, Mark
