On Wed, 26 May 2021 10:09:31 -0300
Érico Nogueira <eric...@disroot.org> wrote:
> Hi! Are you sure this is necessary? In Void Linux, we cross compile
> elfutils for arm and aarch64 without any issue, and I have built it a
> few times for powerpc as well.
>
Hello!
Yes, I am sure. I do not know about you process (check, that you really
cross, not run via qemu or like). Build process _run_ i386_gendis to
generate headers:
<snip>
if MAINTAINER_MODE
noinst_HEADERS += memory-access.h i386_parse.h i386_data.h
noinst_PROGRAMS = i386_gendis$(EXEEXT)
$(srcdir)/%_dis.h: %_defs i386_gendis$(EXEEXT)
$(AM_V_GEN)./i386_gendis$(EXEEXT) $< > $@T <================
$(AM_V_at)mv -f $@T $@
else
$(srcdir)/%_dis.h:
@echo '*** missing $@; configure with --enable-maintainer-mode'
@false
endif
</snip>
> > +if CROSS
> > +i386_gendis_LINK = ${CC_FOR_BUILD} ${LDFLAGS} -o $@
> > +
> > +$(i386_gendis_OBJECTS): CC=${CC_FOR_BUILD}
> > +endif
>
> Isn't this hardcoding an assumption that the build machine is x86?
I think no. But this question is for original author:
commit 3cbdd387c752999255aea91600b5cfdefbeac7d0
Author: Ulrich Drepper <drep...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jan 2 17:44:39 2008 +0000
propagate from branch 'com.redhat.elfutils.disasm' (head
d15b4eb794e81e477f9896fe82a74cb5ecf4514c) to branch
'com.redhat.elfutils' (head
eaacbf01f8cc89d043ec6eca9b5e35cb5c4cde06)
;)
