https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |mark at klomp dot org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
(In reply to vifoxa2454 from comment #0)
> I believe that the bug is that the tool stops at this point instead of
> continuing with the next table.
>
> The problematic code (in src/readelf.c taken from version 0.185):
>
> if (linep == lineendp)
> {
> puts (_("\nNo line number statements."));
> return;
> }
>
>
> If I comment out that block the tool work again for our use case.
You are right, that return should have been a continue statement.
I fixed it and added a testcase for this:
commit 6648d378bd94f50b455a8550db5f43ef3690b451
Author: Mark Wielaard <[email protected]>
Date: Sun Jul 4 00:08:32 2021 +0200
readelf: Handle line tables without line number statements correctly
When we see a line table without line number statements we need to
continue with the next table. Add a testcase for this situation.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28032
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <[email protected]>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
