https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30077
--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > These issues sometimes appear with -flto -Wlto-type-mismatch but not clear > that's the case here. Yes, but typedefs don't define new types, just alias types. Also it looks like this is actually allowed (at least in C11, maybe some compilers didn't accept it before?): - a typedef name may be redefined to denote the same type as it currently does, provided that type is not a variably modified type -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
