https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967
--- Comment #4 from Aleksei Vetrov <vvvvvv at google dot com> --- (In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #3) > Is there some reason not to just bump up that bitfield width from :24 to :32 > or more for now, until a deeper analysis of llvm informs us as to how wide > these discriminator codes can really be? For me it is ok to bump that bitfield, but there is a warning in the code: > All the flags and other bit fields should add up to 48 bits > to give the whole struct a nice round size. So this question should be directed to the author of this code: Roland McGrath <rol...@redhat.com>. I think there may be slight performance/memory issues, but as a temporary solution it looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
