Hi Brian, On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 16:31 +0000, Brian Cain wrote: > > > ... implies a new EF_HEXAGON_TINY 0x8000 definition BTW. > > > > You obviously know this architecture better than me. But is the TINY > > flag (bit 15) appropriate for all machines? It looks like it can only > > be set on V67 and V71. If so maybe just check those two explicitly? > > So far, V67T and V71T are the only ones with this variation. > It could also be specified on yet-to-be-created future devices > (some theoretical V99T might exist). > What should the behavior be in those cases?
OK, if there could be other TINY variants then either the check suggested by Matheus or you would be more correct. I do like the idea to have a self documenting EF_HEXAGON_TINY constant for this. Thanks, Mark
