https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33635
--- Comment #11 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> --- > It's easy to distinguish --homepage starting with '^http' and in that case > only do the redirect, otherwise, if --homepage is just a <filename>.html, do > both redirect and serve that file. One's a redirect, one's a file content service. A redirect to /foo.html would work entirely differently to a web browser than a service of the contents of /foo.html; the former can be furtherprocessed by a nearby web proxy/server, the latter cannot. One can redirect to other non-http URLs. They operations are different and don't need to be munged into a single option that then needs iffy heuristics to tell the two apart. > For serving whole directory ... how would you envision passing that > directory to debuginfod? As a tarball? This opens yet more security cans of worms. Please let's not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
