On Thu, Jun 25, 2026, at 12:33 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> OK, so then we should push Naveed's v2 patch (which makes the MIN
> change)?
>
>> , but it's worth
>> considering whether we should have this case fail with
>> return false instead of asserting or silently cutting off the second
>> half of the x86_64 register file. 
>
> Or... Do you want to request this change?
> I think you are the best person to determine what is best here.
After consideration, I would go ahead and push Naveed's fix with the MIN().

Signed-off-by: Serhei Makarov <[email protected]>

Reply via email to