<http://directory.fsf.org/Elinks.html> claims "Licensed under The GNU General Public License, Version 2 or later". This seems to have been true originally. In elinks-0.9.3/src/dialogs/info.c:
> "This program is free software; you can redistribute it " > "and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public " > "License as published by the Free Software Foundation; " > "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any " > "later version."), However, in elinks-0.10.0/src/dialogs/info.c: > "This program is free software; you can redistribute it " > "and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public " > "License as published by the Free Software Foundation, " > "specifically version 2 of the License."), According to ChangeLog, this was changed on 2004-01-11, thus after "%%license-verified-on: 2003-01-24". There is also a further note in elinks-0.11.3/COPYING: > Note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as ELinks is > concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not v2.2 > or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly stated otherwise. That is at > least the policy for all pasky's contributions and the default - if you > want different policy for your patches, the best way to state it is by > a patch for your AUTHORS entry. > > If pasky likes GPLv3, he might relicence his contributions for GPLv3 > as well. The default policy should probably be that you trust pasky, > Jonas, or the current maintainer of the day to do the right thing (much > like it is in the Linux kernel). But this needs to be yet worked out > and agreed upon. Please update the licensing information in the Free Software Directory.
pgpxsdgv5ifeh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
