On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote: > ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate > warnings with autoconf 2.68. > --- > configure.in | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in > index 023af06..9d992ee 100644 > --- a/configure.in > +++ b/configure.in > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM > AC_C_CONST > AC_C_INLINE > AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]]) > -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ > +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[ > int add(int change); > > static int sum; > @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[ > sub(int change) > { > return add(-change); > - }]], > + }]])], > [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]]) > AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline], > [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function > without > inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to > identifiers with internal linkage. This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and > 6.7.4p3 together. Otherwise define as nothing.])],
The above patch still applies. Any chance to get this in? Thanks in advance! Kamil _______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev