On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:17:19PM -0500, Felix Janda wrote:
> Essentially yes, which is why I called it a "hacky patch". Note that
> ssl_do_connect is the same thing as gnutls_handshake and
> SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ is GNUTLS_E_AGAIN. I am too inexperienced with
> gnutls and elinks to fix this cleanly.
---end quoted text---

I found another patch on  
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797931

but the author reported that it didn't work
-- 
‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
 Digital design engineer
GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7
GPG Fingerprints:
 6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066  6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761
 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/elinks-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to