Nevermind that. I was looking at a codepoint table, not a utf8 table for the latin encoding.
Thanks for your help and patience. On Jan 28, 2008 6:07 PM, Rick R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for looking at that.. I do have a question though. > ISO-8859-1 is basically subset of UTF-8, correct? It's codes can be > found in the U+0000 to U+00FF range in utf8. > e9 in 8859-1 == e9 in utf8 > > Why are they being interpreted differently? > > > On Jan 28, 2008 4:39 PM, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Rick R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I have attached the test_fr.html file. > > > > That file is not UTF-8. > > set document.codepage.assume = "ISO-8859-1" works OK with it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > elinks-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users > > > > > > > -- > "Myths and legends die hard in America. We love them for the extra > dimension they provide, the illusion of near-infinite possibility to > erase the narrow confines of most men's reality. Weird heroes and > mould-breaking champions exist as living proof to those who need it > that the tyranny of 'the rat race' is not yet final." -- Hunter S. > Thompson > -- "Myths and legends die hard in America. We love them for the extra dimension they provide, the illusion of near-infinite possibility to erase the narrow confines of most men's reality. Weird heroes and mould-breaking champions exist as living proof to those who need it that the tyranny of 'the rat race' is not yet final." -- Hunter S. Thompson _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
