Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 08/09/22 12:09 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
>> Can you please point me to the parts that have different and restrictive
>> licenses? I am afraid ELinks in Debian may have to be stripped to
>> remove those that don't meet the Debian free software guidelines. I'll
>> have to make the other licenses explicit in the debian/copyright file as
>> well.
>
> I could only find the following:
>
> src/osdep/getifaddrs.c: BSD (3 clause)
> src/osdep/getifaddrs.h: BSD (3 clause)
> src/util/md5.c: Public domain
> src/util/sha1.c: MPL (v1.1) GPLv2
> src/util/sha1.h: MPL (v1.1) GPLv2
Looking in ELinks 0.13.GIT:
acinclude.m4: some macros "can be copied and used freely without restrictions"
aclocal.m4: must preserve notice
config/config.guess: GPLv2 or later, plus special exception
config/config.sub: GPLv2 or later, plus special exception
config/install-sh: MIT
config/m4/gettext.m4: "can be copied and used freely without restrictions"
config/m4/lcmessage.m4: "can be copied and used freely without restrictions"
config/m4/progtest.m4: "can be copied and used freely without restrictions"
config/missing: GPLv2 or later
config/mkinstalldirs: Public domain
configure: "unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it" from FSF,
but this is also derived from configure.in, which I presume is GPLv2
contrib/conv/mailcap.pl: GPLv2 or later
contrib/debian/rules: "GNU copyright 1997 to 1999 by Joey Hess",
whatever that means
contrib/LinksOS2Icon.zip: part public domain
contrib/links_wps.zip: part GPLv2 or later
COPYING: changing the text of GPLv2 is not allowed
doc/manual.txt: "Hold blameless the authors. Any lawful use is allowed."
which I think also applies to the files included from there,
except perhaps to {builddir}features.txt which is derived from
features.conf.
doc/tools/asciidoc/: GPLv2 or later
doc/tools/help2xml: ISC licence
po/perl/Locale/PO.pm: "same terms as Perl itself", i.e. GPLv1 or later
or Artistic License
po/perl/msgaccel-check: ISC licence
po/perl/msgaccel-prepare: ISC licence
src/: I didn't look there
test/align.html: from www.czech-tv.cz, no explicit license, so you may have
to remove this
test/bigtextarea.html: changing the text of GPLv2 is not allowed
test/color.html: possibly derived from rgb.txt of X11?
test/css/idnes_mail.html: apparently from idnes.cz, no explicit license,
so you may have to remove this
test/erreurs_en.htm: unclear origin, no explicit license, so you may have
to remove this
test/javascript_broken.html: presumably from www.hotjobs.com, no explicit
license, so you may have to remove this
test/optgroup.html: apparently from iccl.fi, no explicit license,
so you may have to remove this, unless the author is willing
to grant one (I asked a few minutes ago)
test/poocs.net.html: presumably from poocs.net, no explicit license, so you
may have to remove this
Unicode/8859_10.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_14.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_16.cp: "Copyright (c) 1991-2001 Unicode, Inc. All Rights
reserved."
but <http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-16.TXT> seems
pretty similar (however not equivalent) and comes with an actual licence
Unicode/8859_3.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_5.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_6.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_7.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_8.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/8859_9.cp: some Unicode Consortium licence
Unicode/cp1250.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp1256.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp1257.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp437.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp737.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp850.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp852.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/cp866.cp: from Microsoft, no explicit license, but they
publish similar cross-mapping tables at www.unicode.org
so it's hard to imagine them complaining about this
Unicode/entities.txt: public domain
_______________________________________________
elinks-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
