> I favor lhs/rhs, it's unambiguous and doesn't force you to work to someone > else's expectations of what side the "expected" value should go on. >
A convention could be established, as it's been the case in other languages. Nevertheless, I do think that you have a fair point. Then, what do you think of replacing lhs and rhs with the less cryptic left and right? Not that the acronym is hard to guess, but it's still less user-friendly than plain English, IMHO. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/86971ed8-0d22-482f-a5c3-a8799a6fc7b7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
