+1 from me. Seems consistent with `get_in` and `put_in` and follows
the semantics of `fetch`.
Allen Madsen
http://www.allenmadsen.com


On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Brian Cardarella <[email protected]> wrote:
> When using `with` there are several times I wish I could have reached deeper
> into a Map or Keyword list in a single line rather than multiple fetch
> statements. Ideally it would work like this:
>
> ```
> map = %{foo: %{bar: "baz"}}
>
> %{:ok, "bar"} = fetch_in(map, [:foo, :bar])
> :error = fetch_in(map, [:foo, :qux])
> :error = fetch_in(map, [:bar])
> ```
>
> If this is OK I can implement it.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/7daf519b-6122-4aeb-a8bd-7115625f28a9%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAK-y3CtmM%3DFYxkXH-anRyMyzgk91suFgNepaj7CrzCffU7pvOQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to