If it were included I would want it to be a bit more useful (and could
perhaps be rolled into the map syntax itself with sigil, but I'm fine with
it as a library): https://github.com/whatyouhide/short_maps/issues/13
On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 10:40:48 AM UTC-6, Wiebe-Marten Wijnja wrote:
>
> Hmm... this is the kind of feature that I would've used a lot, had I known
> that a package that provided this shorthand syntax existed.
> I will definitely do so in the future. I really like the sigil idea.
>
> Are we still opposed to including the `~m` sigil in the base language?
>
> On Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 12:19:46 PM UTC+2, Devin Torres wrote:
>>
>> Taking a pretty cool page out of ES6:
>>
>> # If `method`, `url`, `headers`, and `payload` are already bound
>> %Request{method, url, headers, payload}
>>
>> # If e.g. `payload` hasn't been bound yet
>> %Request{method, url, headers, payload: get_payload()}
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/8f231010-c673-487b-b7fa-a3d488838921%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
