Hi Peter, can you talk a bit more about your use case? chunk may be very sensitive to ordering so you will be chunking in no defined order. Maybe using a window that is based on event count may be a better fit semantically?
*José Valim* www.plataformatec.com.br Skype: jv.ptec Founder and Director of R&D On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Peter C. Marks <[email protected]> wrote: > In an application of GenStage that I've been writing, I came across the > need for something like Stream.chunk/2 or Stream.chunk/4 but for Flows. > > Is there a reason why Flow.chunk is not defined? > > Thanks, > > Peter > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/elixir-lang-core/7c5e942f-1e55-4f90-bc79- > 79dc0622d292%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/7c5e942f-1e55-4f90-bc79-79dc0622d292%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2BPR4X_oAq4M5o8mA0EZ9Ck32ZEgwhPhtjHCZOWENkC6g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
