> If this stays, is it expected to be a compiler error in Elixir 2.0? That's still being discussed as we evaluate the overall strategy of what is a warning and what is an error.
> If so, does that mean that we would be able to call anonymous functions without the dot? No because the anonymous function call without the dot is not an issue to how the function is invoked but related to how a function is captured. This has been discussed extensively in the past so I recommend looking at those previous discussions, especially the one that explains Lisp 1 vs Lisp 2 namespaces. *José Valim* www.plataformatec.com.br Skype: jv.ptec Founder and Director of R&D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4Jzj799B7kFi6zuMy6durL6i88DqAh%3DFyshSVNb-BCfoA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
