> could we at least not warn if the ambiguity can be resolved at compile
time—if there’s a function/0 available with the given name, just compile it
as a call and move on?

That's exactly the behaviour we had before. After all, if you do not have a
variable nor a function name, it wouldn't compile with reason no variable
or function named x.


*José Valim*
www.plataformatec.com.br
Skype: jv.ptec
Founder and Director of R&D

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Dave Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 10:12:30 AM UTC-6, José Valim wrote:
>
> > Basically, what compelling problem drove this change? It isn't an issue
>> I ever had before, and the change seems to make my code worse.
>>
>> There were a couple scenarios that I either personally ran into or were
>> frequently reported. One of those came from Plug test suite. In Plug it is
>> common to pass the connection named as "conn" around between setup/tests:
>>
> So we lose things like this?
>
> iex(2)> v
> warning: variable "v" does not exist and is being expanded to "v()", please 
> use parentheses to remove the ambiguity or change the variable name
>   iex:2
>
> There’s a simple cure for variable/function ambiguity—choose good names
> and write trivial functions. This kind of thing typically bites when your
> code is struggling in some extended swamp of names. Maybe being bitten on
> those occasions is just what the developer needs to stop doing it :)
>
> Even if you really, really want to do this (please reconsider), could we
> at least not warn if the ambiguity can be resolved at compile time—if
> there’s a function/0 available with the given name, just compile it as a
> call and move on?
>
> Dave
> ​
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4KPq2UyFF2qP-FwFAagG-KCoKam_GfHgwztC0sm9j3NgQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to