Would it be acceptable and sufficient, when using the defstruct macro, to define default implementations of the methods required for the Access behaviour?
Allen Madsen http://www.allenmadsen.com On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Ólafur Arason <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the exact problem I don't get it from the description is it that > struts don't have Access built in, because that is solveable, or that > because you have default value like nil set in a struct you can't create a > nested structure on the fly? > > Regards, > Olaf > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/elixir-lang-core/1f0a4e4c-83a6-4329-9e02- > 771369f2793a%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAK-y3Cs_oUXWvKp2_3cHEw2ErYUOJg65RsFt8yYg%3DVp%2BEqCNpg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
