On 23 Feb 2017, 10:57 +0100, José Valim <[email protected]>, wrote:
> Right. The issue also exists in the current proposal for any parameter that > is passed via the child_spec. The trouble with your proposal is that the only > option is to pass parameters *via the child_spec*. While the original > proposal still allows customization via start_link. What if we had a custom supervisor implementation that would always call child_spec before restarting? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/9a6bf69c-ab92-44ee-855c-775be46bd27f%40Spark. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
