It's even clearer written like this:

Enum.reject(list, &is_nil/1)


On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 8:29:15 AM UTC-7, Paul Schoenfelder wrote:
>
> This is probably my Ruby experience/bias exposing itself but:
>>
>> - removing nil elements from a collection is a common pattern
>> - Enum.compact(list) is more intention-revealing than Enum.reject(list, 
>> &(nil?(&1)))
>>
>
> I really don't agree that `Enum.compact(list)` is somehow more revealing 
> than `Enum.reject(list, &is_nil/1)` - it is clear what the latter will do, 
> it is not clear what the former will do. I think there is a lot more of the 
> Ruby bias in this statement than you think ;). I'm not sold on the idea of 
> adding a function to the standard library which is so trivially written 
> with functions that already exist, at the sacrifice of clarity.
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:14 AM, OvermindDL1 <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> If you use an erlang nil `[]` (the empty list) instead of a Elixir's 
>> `nil` (which is an atom, which is weird) as nil's then you can just use 
>> `:lists.flatten`.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 4:28:30 AM UTC-6, Sam Davies wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for this
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 5:49:33 PM UTC+1, Steve Downey wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is probably my Ruby experience/bias exposing itself but:
>>>>
>>>> - removing nil elements from a collection is a common pattern
>>>> - Enum.compact(list) is more intention-revealing than Enum.reject(list, 
>>>> &(nil?(&1)))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:40:33 PM UTC-7, Patrick Van Stee wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Would implementing an `Enum.compact/1` be useful to anyone? It would 
>>>>> basically just be the same as calling `Enum.reject` with `&nil?/1`.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's an example:
>>>>>
>>>>> iex> Enum.compact([1, nil, 3, nil, 5])  
>>>>> [1, 3, 5]
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "elixir-lang-core" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/0bcae60f-2dca-466a-8d62-e03d75028eee%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/0bcae60f-2dca-466a-8d62-e03d75028eee%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/6e08c7bc-b560-4b6f-85dc-fda62a43985f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to