Sounds good to me, since it can be considerably cheaper than the options we have today.
*José Valim* www.plataformatec.com.br Skype: jv.ptec Founder and Director of R&D On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Parker Selbert <[email protected]> wrote: > Recently I discovered an application bug that stemmed from the use of > MapSet.subset?/2. The code was attempting to check whether there was any > overlap between two sets, but the use of subset?/2 is order dependent. > The solution was to use MapSet.disjoint?/2 and check if the result was > false, but that was not obvious and feels backwards. > > I'm proposing the addition of MapSet.intersect?/2, which will check > whether two sets have any members in common. For larger sets the best case > performance would be better than "not disjoint", and it would be a more > obvious solution. > > Thoughts? > > — Parker > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/elixir-lang-core/15f6857f-6f2e-49fe-ad2b- > b214b2b12e98%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/15f6857f-6f2e-49fe-ad2b-b214b2b12e98%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2BYJyMXkKcLQPScqVgrpUH2UNTTLV%3DP1yAVNfEj%2BpVj4w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
