I totally agree with that proverb, and we definitely don't do the religious 
following of DRY that is such an antipattern all the time. I just worry 
that maybe there is an entire legion of utilities that are in use across 
the board, and maybe 2 or 3 of those are integral enough to be a part of 
the standard library and maybe another 10-20 of those could standardize on 
a much more performant version than the simple helpers that many developers 
might end up using in the interest of time, and maybe another 20 of those 
are utilities people never even thought of using but could really help them 
out. I know browsing the stdlib functions and documentation really helps 
our new elixir engineers. I definitely see your point about bloat. I *may* 
find/start a common utility library, just to find out whether or not I'm 
the only one who thinks it may be useful, and to maybe find new and better 
versions of utilities that might help us. We're at like 60k LoC so sharing 
some utilities isn't out of the question.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/c02ce1f3-1a2f-457d-8239-91e16d26916a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to