Hi José,

Thanks for the response. Running Elixir is certainly necessary and your 
code example would solve the stdin/stdout issue. 

It's not immediately clear to me, however, how to support .formatter.exs 
files using this approach (aside from eval-ing the file separately and 
passing a keyword list to format_string!(). 

Please let me know if I misread the docs and there is a way to do this. If 
not, then adding a --stdin flag to Mix formatter task would address both 
issues.

Thanks in advance.


On Sunday, October 15, 2017 at 10:15:47 AM UTC-5, Jan Fornoff wrote:
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Thanks for your remark, I think we're using the same setup then :-) 
>
> Jose, would you be open to accepting such a --stdin flag into the Mix 
> formatter task? 
>
> I'm sure we could find someone to get that done, if it's generally 
> welcome. 
>
> Best, 
> Jan
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 16:54 Pedro Medeiros <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jan.
>>
>> The new version of the formatter tool already can format directly to 
>> stdout. Me and other vim users are already hacking our editors to format 
>> the code before the write. the command is *$ mix format --print*
>>
>> 2017-10-15 9:43 GMT-04:00 Jan Fornoff <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>>
>>> Agree with Ron. It'd be a great and editor-agnostic addition to have an 
>>> option to utilize STDIN for quicker formatting experience on save!
>>>
>>> Would be willing to help if a hand is needed!
>>> Best,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> On Friday, 13 October 2017 17:58:25 UTC+2, [email protected]  wrote:
>>> > Thanks for the responses. 
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Yes, I was trying to avoid running an Elixir node to keep things as 
>>> simple as possible. Vim, Emacs, Sublime, VS Code, etc will each need to 
>>> integrate with the new code formatter. Supporting stdin/stdout via a 
>>> command line option would make integration simple and consistent across all 
>>> editors. Otherwise, each editor will need to run an Elixir node or use a 
>>> tmp file (to support formatting files that haven't been saved to the file 
>>> system yet).
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks again for the feedback.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ron
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 5:18:45 PM UTC-5, OvermindDL1 wrote:
>>> > The atom packages I've seen for elixir run an elixir node to do syntax 
>>> coloring, highlighting, intellisense, and more.  They should either use one 
>>> of those connections directly (best speed) or they could just run it on the 
>>> command-line.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 4:09:38 PM UTC-6, Allen Madsen wrote:
>>> > I suspect the Atom package can't have elixir in it, which is probably 
>>> why he was hoping there'd be the stdin/stdout support in the mix format 
>>> command itself.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Allen Madsen
>>> > http://www.allenmadsen.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:42 PM, OvermindDL1 <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > You can just call the formatting function directly.  :-)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > iex(1)> Code.format_string!("blah 42") 
>>>                                                                             
>>>                   
>>> > ["blah", "(", "", "42", "", ")"]
>>> >
>>> > iex(2)> Code.format_string!("blah 42") |> :erlang.iolist_to_binary() 
>>>                                                                 
>>> > "blah(42)"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 2:35:45 PM UTC-6, [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>> > I apologize if this topic has already been covered.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Have there been any discussions about adding support for 
>>> reading/writing via stdin/stdout to the new code formatter coming v1.6? 
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I've release an Atom package that formats Elixir code automatically on 
>>> save using the new formatter. If the formatter supported stdin/stout it 
>>> would eliminate the need to write to a tmp file, which would greatly reduce 
>>> latency.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I'm happy to help implement this, but wanted to see if there had been 
>>> any discussion already.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks in advance!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ron Green
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>> >
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> >
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/c7102ea4-d4fe-4a83-b0f2-07feea48f577%40googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>
>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/b2d7edb0-81be-4a75-903e-b35dfb7a3247%40googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Pedro Henrique de Souza Medeiros
>> ----------------------------------
>> Cel: +55 (21) 9914-86898
>> Email: [email protected] <javascript:>
>>
>> Beautiful is better than ugly,
>> Explicit is better than implicit,
>> Simple is better than complex,
>> Complex is better than complicated.
>>
>> The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elixir-lang-core/JU0a80TWFJA/unsubscribe
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAJbPmJNdupnHBLYx1zo8vSRpkHQVuqgfvDu11npimLP_xXKBJw%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAJbPmJNdupnHBLYx1zo8vSRpkHQVuqgfvDu11npimLP_xXKBJw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/c2fdab7d-5cc9-46ba-aa8a-6039b2212523%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to