I wouldn't recommend having the default operators delegate to such a 
protocol, rather just a `cmp` or `compare` or something call, along with a 
warning about using the operators on a struct if it is statically known 
that it is a struct (not too uncommon).


On Friday, October 19, 2018 at 4:50:02 PM UTC-6, Sheharyar Naseer wrote:
>
> Struct comparisons already throw a warning 
> <https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/741dfda9f4be898c647426493f1d17fb9a4b9c53/lib/elixir/src/elixir_expand.erl#L1161-L1165>
>  
> in Elixir, as it does not make a lot of sense to compare them (except in 
> some very specific cases like date/time):
>
> warning: invalid comparison with struct literal ~N"2018-10-19 
>> 21:35:18.005355". Comparison operators (>, <, >=, <=) perform structural 
>> and not semantic comparison. Comparing with a struct literal is unlikely to 
>> give a meaningful result. Modules typically define a compare/2 function 
>> that can be used for semantic comparison
>>
>
> But currently this happens only when literal structs are used. For 
> example, when using `Enum.sort` to sort a list of dates, this warning is 
> not raised. I know there already has been some discussion on this 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elixir-lang-core/eE_mMWKdVYY>, 
> but I believe OvermindDL's suggested approach 
> <https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/pull/7274#issuecomment-361362861> 
> to have a Comparable protocol is much better. Kernel's comparison operators 
> would delegate to this protocol, with implementations for common things 
> like Date/Time, and letting it simply throw Protocol.UndefinedError for 
> structs which do not have explicitly implemented it.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/d3d1dad2-c713-4c73-90a3-acfabe190910%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to