I would be ok with `fun/1,2` but I prefer Christopher's solution using
`fun/{1,2}` since that notation is already used in the core on various
occasions.On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 06:04, eksperimental <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Fernando for bringing this back to life. > I'm OK. Let's have an agreement so we can start supporting it in ExDoc and > make the according > changes to core. > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 14:10:18 +0200 > Wojtek Mach <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Is anyone ok with `fun/1,2`? `fun/*` won't be supported. > > > > I think this is already a pretty common way so definitely +1 from me on > making it official. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/20190813110430.52fabd61.eksperimental%40autistici.org > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAFuVuxwbMtSN9d_9Ry6wz%3DN-5y%2B%3DX9r%3D7dVq2Ad8vW1X80LWSQ%40mail.gmail.com.
