P.S. Is it possible to provide a gist of how to do the compilation with the 
dynamic linking replaced with static ones.
Also, I a total noob web dev, so pardon my inaccuracies

Best regards
R

On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 2:05:51 PM UTC+5:30, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am interested to see that while making a deployable elixir release, the 
> release system can bundle in the dynamically linked binaries like openssl
> Would that amount to the same effort on the elixir team's end?
>
> It would be great to be able to create desktop apps(non gui) using elixir
>
> Regards
> R
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 4:05:30 PM UTC+5:30, dch wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 14 May 2019, at 16:49, Thomas Cioppettini wrote: 
>> > Hmm this might be a nice side project. I think we could start with the 
>> > most common environments and build out from there. Based on some quick 
>> > research this may be more automatable than you may think. Based on what 
>> > I've seen most projects just are linking to the github archive and 
>> > hardcoding a hash of the contents. If that's it, then it should be 
>> > fairly reasonable to just update it. I'll do some more research and get 
>> > back to you. 
>> > 
>> > On Monday, May 13, 2019 at 2:35:20 AM UTC-4, José Valim wrote: 
>> > > Hi Thomas, 
>> > > 
>> > > It is not possible for us to handle all of the different OSes and 
>> package managers, manage permissions, debug errors, etc. Publishing is only 
>> one part of the process. 
>> > > 
>> > > However, we will be glad to improve our current "broadcast" 
>> infrastructure, so whenever we publish a new version, everyone can receive 
>> an event and have their automation tool publish to the OSes they consider 
>> common. Today you can get those events either via the google groups OR via 
>> the GitHub releases page (which provides a feed IIRC). 
>> > > 
>> > > *José Valim* 
>> > > www.plataformatec.com.br 
>> > > Skype: jv.ptec 
>> > > Founder and Director of R&D 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:39 AM Thomas Cioppettini <t...@scalpel.com> 
>> wrote: 
>> > >> I think we should manage the distribution of elixir to common 
>> package managers after a release has been built. 
>> > >> 
>> > >> Right now we rely on other maintainers to be aware that elixir has 
>> been updated, and do their respective work to add the most recent package 
>> to their repository. This process is slow and unreliable, we should 
>> automate it so that the most recent versions of libraries are available 
>> everywhere. 
>>
>> Hi Thomas, 
>>
>> This is a desirable goal & I don't want to dissuade you, but this is a 
>> surprising amount of work, often requiring manual tweaking that requires a 
>> reasonably deep understanding of how packages and package managers work on 
>> a given system. 
>>
>> <combinatorial explosion> 
>> The end result is that you begin to ship a custom OTP release, including 
>> static OpenSSL, and having your own per-OS custom package repos, to try to 
>> keep up. Then you find out that popular project X doesn't yet support that 
>> version of OTP, so now you ship multiple OTP releases per Elixir release. 
>> Phoenix, RabbitMQ, & CouchDB are well-known projects with varying bits of 
>> Elixir on the inside. 
>> </combinatorial explosion> 
>>
>> That said, https://repology.org/project/elixir/versions may well be a 
>> useful place to start for somebody who is interested in hunting down what's 
>> lagging behind and submitting patches. Its source code is 
>> https://github.com/repology/repology & 
>> https://github.com/repology/repology-rules, and a neat hack would be, 
>> after X days after a release, to send a gentle reminder to the maintainers 
>> listed for any lagging downstream distros. Or, to post the list to 
>> elixirforums and recommend people contribute patches for their favourite 
>> distros. 
>>
>> I think that having an announce@ list and encouraging maintainers to 
>> subscribe, is your biggest win for the least effort. It's certainly 
>> shortest in LoC :-) 
>>
>> A+ 
>> Dave 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/a3d120d9-1900-428f-98e5-78bdd17cd963%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to