We have something similar in our code base we called the Maybe.Pipe: ~>

> On 5 Jun 2020, at 14:41, Piotr Szmielew <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> maybe it should be called run_if? so, something like this:
> 
> defmacro run_if(piped_value, condition, fun) do
>   quote do
>     if unquote(condition) do
>       unquote(fun).(unquote(piped_value))
>    else
>      unquote(piped_value)
>     end
>   end
> end
> 
> and then used as:
> 
> %{a: 1, b: 2}
>   |> X.run_if(1 == 2, &Map.put(&1, :foo, "foo"))
>   |> X.run_if(1 == 1, &Map.put(&1, :foo, "bar"))
> # => %{a: 1, b: 2, foo: "bar"}
> 
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:27 PM José Valim <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi Riccardo,
> 
> This is an interesting proposal! Unfortunately if the value you want to 
> compute is expensive, then you need to fallback to the usual `if` approach. 
> This is also specific to maps. It may be worth considering a more general 
> purpose mechanism, for example:
> 
>     map
>     |> update_if(foo != nil, &Map.put(&1, :foo, foo))
>     |> update_if(bar != nil, &Map.put(&1, :bar, normalize_bar(bar)))
> 
> Being in Kernel also allows us to write it as a macro, which can be further 
> optimized. Not sure if update_if is the best name though. Suggestions and 
> comparisons to other languages are welcome. 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:36 PM Riccardo Binetti <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> this is my first proposal so I hope I get the format right, I've already 
> checked in the mailing list and I haven't found similar proposals.
> 
> Problem
> 
> When manually constructing a map using external options or the result of a 
> pattern match on a struct, I often find myself in the situation where I have 
> to add a value only if it is non-nil.
> 
> The possible approaches available today are these
> 
> Using if
> 
> 
> def some_fun(s) do
>   MyStruct{
>     foo: foo,
>     bar: bar,
>     baz: baz
>   } = s
> 
>   map = %{a: "hello", b: 42}
> 
>   map =
>     if foo do
>       Map.put(map, :foo, foo)
>     else
>       map
>     end
> 
>   map =
>     if bar do
>       Map.put(map, :bar, bar)
>     else
>       map
>     end
> 
>   if bar do
>     Map.put(map, :baz, baz)
>   else
>     map
>   end
> end
> 
> 
> This is the obvious solution, but it gets very verbose very quickly
> 
> 
> Populating the map and then filtering
> 
> def some_fun(s) do
>   MyStruct{
>     foo: foo,
>     bar: bar,
>     baz: baz
>   } = s
> 
>   %{a: "hello", b: 42}
>   |> Map.put(:foo, foo)
>   |> Map.put(:bar, bar)
>   |> Map.put(:baz, baz)    
>   |> Enum.filter(fn {_k, v} -> v end)
>   |> Enum.into(%{})
> end
> 
> This is more concise, but it creates intermediate maps that are immediately 
> thrown away. Moreover, if the initial map is very large, the filter operation 
> is expensive since it traverses the whole map.
> 
> 
> Implementing a maybe_put helper function
> 
> def some_fun(s) do
>   MyStruct{
>     foo: foo,
>     bar: bar,
>     baz: baz
>   } = s
> 
>   %{a: "hello", b: 42}
>   |> maybe_put(:foo, foo)
>   |> maybe_put(:bar, bar)
>   |> maybe_put(:baz, baz)    
> end
> 
> defp maybe_put(map, _key, nil), do: map
> defp maybe_put(map, key, value), do: Map.put(map, key, value)
> 
> This is the solution I end implementing almost always. It is present in 
> multiple modules across the codebase I work on (and/or put in a generic Utils 
> module), and talking with my colleagues I found out that is a utility 
> function that they also have to implement often and it has turned up at least 
> a couple times[1][2] also in the Elixir Forum.
> 
> [1] 
> https://elixirforum.com/t/elixir-way-to-conditionally-update-a-map/17952/21?u=rbino
>  
> <https://elixirforum.com/t/elixir-way-to-conditionally-update-a-map/17952/21?u=rbino>
> [2] 
> https://elixirforum.com/t/is-there-way-to-create-map-and-conditionally-exclude-some-keys/23315/5?u=rbino
>  
> <https://elixirforum.com/t/is-there-way-to-create-map-and-conditionally-exclude-some-keys/23315/5?u=rbino>
> 
> This brings me to my proposal, which is a more generic version of maybe_put.
> 
> Proposal
> 
> Add Map.put_if/4 to the Map module. This is more generic (and imho clearer) 
> than maybe_put and can be used to solve the same problem without creating 
> intermediate results and allowing the code to be clear and concise.
> 
> 
> def some_fun(s) do
>   MyStruct{
>     foo: foo,
>     bar: bar,
>     baz: baz
>   } = s
> 
>   %{a: "hello", b: 42}
>   |> Map.put_if(:foo, foo, foo != nil)
>   |> Map.put_if(:bar, bar, bar != nil)
>   |> Map.put_if(:baz, baz, baz != nil)    
> end
> 
> Let me know if you need any other information.
> --
> Riccardo
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/f513b901-fd93-4f28-88a2-f496a3c84a21o%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/f513b901-fd93-4f28-88a2-f496a3c84a21o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4K_QVpD-eRG6JUOMYV5pVTLchpTgbO0fqN6pPCmuSL4NA%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4K_QVpD-eRG6JUOMYV5pVTLchpTgbO0fqN6pPCmuSL4NA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CANmTJ6thcegKJjb7aKPhtQoqfo5%3DCgJo2-KnORRg8B2UcEB%3D-A%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CANmTJ6thcegKJjb7aKPhtQoqfo5%3DCgJo2-KnORRg8B2UcEB%3D-A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/7EDB412A-077A-46F1-B44C-01C1B8D58E19%40a-corp.co.uk.

Reply via email to