Any expression is allowed in the comma-separated steps of a with expression. 
You can put in IO.inspect(myvar) (which I often use for debugging purposes). A 
pattern match (=) is an allowed expression. It is not a bug.

-Greg Vaughn

> On Aug 12, 2020, at 7:42 PM, Bruno Rafael <brunorafael6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I mistyped the match operator with an equal signal (=) using the with 
> statement and the compiler didn't warn. When calling a function with args 
> that don't match the condition of a with statement where the match operator 
> is a = the code breaks. I don't know if it's the desired behavior but when 
> using the with statement and some condition doesn't match I would expect it 
> to go to the else statement. Should the compiler warn in these cases?
> 
> elixir 1.10.3
> erlang 22.3.4.1
> 
> <Screenshot from 2020-08-12 21-40-20.png>
> 
> Regards,
> Bruno
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/ef2b8e67-4fb1-4a7b-a223-bd1fe7ad2336n%40googlegroups.com.
> <Screenshot from 2020-08-12 21-40-20.png>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/FB3DF634-6456-412F-A5F5-9E0B28002F08%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to