Hi Chris,
Thanks for the proposal.
I would like to first see benchmarks that show a Map implementation can be
considerably more efficient. Otherwise, if it is about saving a couple
Map.new calls, then I would rather not add it, as it will move to copying
many more functions from Enum to Map.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:42 PM Chris Miller <camiller...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any interest in adding a `Map.split_with/2` that would take a
> function of `{key :: any(), value :: any()} -> boolean` and returns
> `{map_where_true :: map(), map_where_false :: map()}`?
>
> I know this functionality can be created easily with the functionality
> thats already exposed, but it seems like it might be a nice addition and
> would add greater parity between Enum and Map - it could also be added to
> Keyword, even thought the distinction between Keyword.split_with and
> Enum.split_with would be nominal.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/0a7b4be9-ccb9-4c6a-b482-96379a6a9a18n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/0a7b4be9-ccb9-4c6a-b482-96379a6a9a18n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4K4M5Fc3pq3AUioWLvN4o69jy3qD%3DGPYRSXFiKWFBcKuw%40mail.gmail.com.
