I have also noticed this. Oftentimes, the error that broke compilation is not 
at the bottom anymore. I have also experienced this as a regression in terms of 
usability, but somehow it hadn't occurred to me to tell anyone about it.

I didn't see anything in open issues, nor in the changelog for 1.16. I am not a 
maintainer, but opening an issue on github seems reasonable to me.

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024, at 00:42, Parker Hewitt wrote:
> Also, i'd like to mention, really the true reason I am looking for a way to 
> suppress the errors is because i'm having hard time finding compile errors in 
> a large swath of compiler warnings.
> 
> I believe at some point the compiled errors used to show up at the end of the 
> compiler output, but something changed that changed the behavior 1.15 maybe? 
> Now it feels like the errors are printed when they are found by the compiler 
> rather at the end of compilation. Was this an intentional change or a 
> regression of some sort?
> 
> I personally feel that while maybe suppressing warnings is contentious, 
> showing compiling errors is a higher priority when compiling than warnings. 
> Errors keep my program from running at all. Warnings might point out a 
> potential problem within my program runtime.
> 
> Is this on anyones radar?
> 
> On Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 2:31:18 PM UTC-5 Parker Hewitt wrote:
>> I too would find a lot of value in this or. Here is the thread that brought 
>> me here, 
>> https://elixirforum.com/t/how-can-i-suppress-warnings-ive-been-looking-for-a-while/60912
>> 
>> It seems y'all are pretty adamant about not supporting this, but what do you 
>> think would be the level of effort to have some rough take on it? If it's a 
>> rather small change I would consider building my own fork just to use 
>> personally.
>> 
>> my three ideas.
>> 1) per warning type suppression
>> 2) warning suppression entirely
>> 3) separate warning and error output via (stdout for warning, and stderr for 
>> error)
>> 
>> On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 4:11:52 AM UTC-4 José Valim wrote:
>>> At the moment we have don't have plans to introduce options to skip 
>>> warnings, except if the warnings may have false positives.
>>> 
>>> For deprecation, typically doing it in two steps is the recommended option, 
>>> especially for libraries: a couple releases with "@doc deprecated" and then 
>>> the official deprecation. :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:25 AM Maciej Małecki <smt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Erlang supports disabling a given warning using compilation configuration 
>>>> (see https://www.erlang.org/doc/man/compile.html). There are use cases for 
>>>> letting developers decide what they treat as a warning and what not. For 
>>>> instance, I'm using `--warnings-as-errors` when compiling the code for 
>>>> production. However, it is impossible to use `deprecated` tags anymore as 
>>>> the complication will fail. I treat deprecations special here because some 
>>>> refactorings can't be done in a single run or some of them don't make 
>>>> sense as the code is legacy anyway.
>>>> 
>>>> I know that there is a `doc deprecated: "..."` mechanism, but it just 
>>>> feels right to use `deprecated` and still allow the 
>>>> `--warnings-as-errors`. The difference between those two would be: no 
>>>> warning during the compilation, but still logging the message when 
>>>> invoking the function.
>>>> 
>>>> This could be implemented similarly to `no_warn_undefined` (see 
>>>> https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/1.14.0/Code.html#put_compiler_option/2).
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to elixir-lang-co...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/0b7281bd-62ae-4a65-a153-eabfe90d5551n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/0b7281bd-62ae-4a65-a153-eabfe90d5551n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/9019952b-7264-428f-ac4d-195706398dcdn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/9019952b-7264-428f-ac4d-195706398dcdn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/73f55317-dd18-4efc-b49b-4e606d995bab%40app.fastmail.com.

Reply via email to