Hi Tobi, can you provide some context of how it would be used, code wise? Which problem are you facing?
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 08:10 Tobias Pfeiffer <prag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello beloved core team, > > TLDR; Should we have Access.get_lazy/3 ? > > As usual I'm sure there is some reason why this doesn't exist yet but I > don't know so here is the question/proposal: > > We have Map.get_lazy/3 and Keyword.get_lazy/3 - they're amazing and > helpful. Access basically encapsulates the 2 and I generally use it where I > can to allow both Keywords and Maps - most commonly when I deal with > options. It doesn't have get_lazy/3 though, which sometimes makes me fall > back to either Map or Keyword (or wrap it myself). > > Using Access.fetch/2 it should also be easy to implement. > > So, would a PR implementing Access.get_lazy/3 be considered? > > Thanks! > Tobi > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAG3Z5YQYuv8SF81vs8UNhtpGN3wA0NHgH1yFhixuwoQmV2S8eQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAG3Z5YQYuv8SF81vs8UNhtpGN3wA0NHgH1yFhixuwoQmV2S8eQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4L6popY-tMX54mKh3kc_cbmYRa7G7G0Em64ZPUoZEX6Lw%40mail.gmail.com.
