> On Aug 9, 2016, at 20:19, rubymi...@foxmail.com wrote:
> Why the name of that strategy is `:one_for_all`, not `:all_for_one`?

They just picked the first clause of the slogan?

  Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno
  ("One for all, all for one")

  -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unus_pro_omnibus,_omnes_pro_uno

-r

 -- 
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm           Rich Morin           r...@cfcl.com
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume    San Bruno, CA, USA   +1 650-873-7841

Software system design, development, and documentation


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/C28F1764-6E69-437E-89D2-4526C1473D0A%40cfcl.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to