> On Aug 9, 2016, at 20:19, rubymi...@foxmail.com wrote: > Why the name of that strategy is `:one_for_all`, not `:all_for_one`?
They just picked the first clause of the slogan? Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno ("One for all, all for one") -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unus_pro_omnibus,_omnes_pro_uno -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin r...@cfcl.com http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume San Bruno, CA, USA +1 650-873-7841 Software system design, development, and documentation -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/C28F1764-6E69-437E-89D2-4526C1473D0A%40cfcl.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.