> What would need to change in the Elm architecture for it to match SAM?
I'm just someone interested in learning elm, so I cannot answer. Are the architects of elm, following these messages, who can? Evan Czaplicki? And is this interesting enough to contact Jean-Jacques Dubray, Evan? Op dinsdag 24 mei 2016 20:30:55 UTC+2 schreef Nick H: > > Peter's description is very close to how I manage states in my code. It > never occurred to me that it might have its own name; it just seemed the > most natural way to manage states within the Elm Architecture. > > The model is a union type. The action is a union type. The update function > is just a case statement, so actions that are nonsensical for the model > state can be easily ignored. > > As far as I can tell, Dubray's criticism of the Elm Architecture is > summarized in this quote: > > "That assertion is erroneous. You would be missing a couple of important > parts: > - the logic that decides which state you are in so you can properly > compute the view and enable the actions associated to the state > - the next action predicate" > > The first point of complaint is that both the update and view functions > need a case statement. > The second point of complaint is that ... I am not sure. It seems to me > that Elm's Effects are filling the role of Dubray's next action predicate > just fine. > > These seem like aesthetic differences, so I am sure there is some point > that I am missing. What would need to change in the Elm architecture for it > to match SAM? > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Peter Damoc <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Aligning Elm with TLA+ will make it even more solid from a theoretical >> point of view. >> >> SAM sounds very intriguing. I'm wondering if SAM couldn't be implemented >> in terms of TEA using a tagged union as Model. >> >> something like this: >> https://gist.github.com/pdamoc/c96714479d9f531fbc7468d5670ef576 >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Stefan Houtzager <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> I am interested in learning elm. I just read an article from >>> Jean-Jacques Dubray. He thinks an alignment with "SAM" would make elm >>> stronger: >>> https://www.infoq.com/articles/no-more-mvc-frameworks#anch133142. >>> Discussions: https://gitter.im/jdubray/sam. >>> What do you think? Might it be interesting to start a discussion >>> with Jean-Jacques Dubray? >>> >>> -- >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Stefan Houtzager >>> >>> Houtzager ICT consultancy & development >>> >>> www.linkedin.com/in/stefanhoutzager >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
