Either that or GHCJS, which seems to have a lot more support from the Haskell community. (Not sure why though).
Looking here <https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/31ui2h/whats_the_current_status_of_ghcjs_vs_haste/> it sounds like GHCJS is more complete and closer to GHC, but Haste makes cleaner JS. Maybe both are worth a try? On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Gage Peterson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that looking at: https://github.com/valderman/haste-compiler > would be cool. This means that things like the elm-fmt and the elm compiler > itself could be (maybe easily) run in the browser. > > > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 10:52:10 AM UTC-6, Rex van der Spuy wrote: >> >> This is wonderful, thank you!! >> I will be using it all the time :) >> >> I know this is out-of-scope but.... >> >> ... how difficult would it be to go a few steps further and turn this >> into an all-in-one Elm IDE, that also works offline? >> A no-setup programming environment (for students especially) that's a >> one-stop-shop for writing and compiling Elm programs would be amazing. >> Anyone care to comment? >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
