> > This is not about subscribers, it's for sending out to the JavaScript. >
A "subscriber" is the name of the JS function that handles the value sent from Elm. As in, app.ports.fetch.subscribe. But yes, it's not about *subscriptions*. Maybe we need a name change... I don't think it's a bug so much as an unsupported feature. Subscribers always get passed a value, and you need to send that value from Elm. You can write your JS functions to ignore the argument, but it needs to be done in Elm nonetheless. Mind you, I don't think allowing ports as commands with no arguments would be a bad change, but it's not going to be added on a whim. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
