Max, yeah I understand the Req structure, but I'm not sure what it benefit 
it would provide with the 401 issue that I'm facing

yeah. Here's the original thread by the way:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/elm-discuss/authentication/elm-discuss/j-Wa6NGiYUM/mDqWXywXAwAJ

I think this entire thread is a roundabout way of me asking about 
Authentication and managing currentUser state. I think I'll open a new 
thread instead.





On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:23:11 PM UTC-4, Mark Hamburg wrote:
>
> Here is the general flow with the request system: 
>
> Instead of returning Cmd msg as part of the update result, modules return 
> Req msg (or List (Req msg) if you don't want to build Req.batch). These get 
> mapped and bubble up just like commands. When they get to the API handler 
> level, however, they get translated into commands that will deliver their 
> results back to the API handler level and get converted into messages to be 
> routed further down the hierarchy just as a command would be. 
>
> The API handler level can generate HTTP requests. It can use mocks for 
> testing. Whatever seems appropriate. 
>
> A similar system could be built for subscriptions. 
>
> Mark 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to